Yay! The Left Now Has Its Own Version of Global Warming Denial

Russian hacking denial has become, for a segment of American leftists, the equivalent of climate change denial: a shibboleth of membership in an enlightened subculture that claims special insight – insight derived from a strict adherence to ideological priors that grant the observer powers to see through the charade of the Mainstream Media. Unlike all those sheeple out there who don’t reflexively reject the entire topic, and just believe whatever CNN tells them.

Now, I agree that this leftist version is more respectable than its rightist counterpart. There actually were, for decades, repeated efforts to gin up conspiracy theories about the Russians for reasons of domestic and geo-politics. We liberals responded by building up a healthy pushback reflex against anything that reminds us of McCarthyism. In contrast, there has never actually been a conspiracy of earth science researchers to gin up an impending disaster in order to advance global socialism, or whatever the hell the wingnuts say the climate scientists are up to.  So, congratulations, our denialism is better than theirs. The problem is, just as Exxon-Mobil and the Kochs have learned how to manipulate the innate skepticism of conservatives towards the media and environmentalism, so has the Russian government learned to play upon the skepticism of the American left about accusations of Russian skullduggery. While the motive for the denialism on the left may be more respectable, Russian hacking denial still leaves us in the position of sticking our fingers in our ears and ignoring a genuine threat.

Russian hacking denial is like a virally-induced immune disorder, with liberal skepticism of accusations towards Russia as the immune response. A system that is supposed to keep us healthy, keep us from being manipulated by government propaganda, has been hijacked by a foreign body to make us more easy to infect with government propaganda.

This will not do.



  1. Part of this is IMO a liberal/left unwillingness to have a real theory about national security. No one is really grappling with how much we should trust the CIA or why. It’s mostly a reflexive ‘lol, the CIA,’ which is fair as a starting point, but it can’t be an ending point. Sometimes the CIA is not wrong.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Yeah, I’m not sure what to do about this. I strongly distrust the CIA – it was only two years ago, after all, that it spied on Dem congressional staffers who were investigating its post-9/11 torture activities, and tried to make trouble for them with the DoJ – but I also think it’s pretty obvious that Russia meddled in the election, and the fact that the CIA is saying so doesn’t make it incorrect.

    I appreciate analysis from leftists like David Klion who have strong knowledge of Russia that predates this election.

    Also, Hi, Joe! I didn’t realize you had your own blog until a friend who lurks on LGM pointed it out to me recently!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, JL.

      It does not help that there actually are people, from the Clinton circle to the Washington Post, who are plainly hyping the story for their own purposes.

      It’s been obvious to me that the Russian government has been screwing around in American politics like this for years. I used to think the Russian trolls, like the ones who infest the comment threads of Robert Farley’s magazine pieces, were funny. “Please to be forgiving my typing. I am eating a Coca-Cola and drinking a mickeymouse.”

      Now Donald Trump is the friggin’ president! Ha ha ha.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s